Work
About half of employed U.S. adults use AI in their role at least a few times a year. Engagement has stayed flat near 31% while adoption rises.
A door, not a memo. What the words mean. What we will not claim. Another AI can recover this without inventing hallways. A tired human can read it without drowning.
TexanoAI builds sovereignty-first AI. MMX™ is the governor for how AI is engaged. The Companion is the highest-resolution application — one person, or with work a team or an organization.
Public numbers. Each one opens a source. The full shelf is Cited field.
About half of employed U.S. adults use AI in their role at least a few times a year. Engagement has stayed flat near 31% while adoption rises.
Organizations reporting AI use: 55% (2023) → 78% (2024). Generative AI in at least one business function: 33% → 71%.
U.S. private AI investment $109.1 billion in 2024 — nearly 12× China, 24× the U.K. in that Index cut.
State AI-related laws: 1 (2016) → 49 (2023) → 131 the following year. Federal AI-related regulations: 25 → 59, from 42 agencies.
The official Commission page for the AI Act.
METI + MIC AI Guidelines for Business. Eight principles live on this site.
Press, April 2024 · English PDF · Ver 1.2 PDF · eight principles · essay
AI-related incidents 233 in 2024 (+56.4% vs 2023).
OpenAI rolled back a GPT-4o update in April 2025 for being “too sycophant-y.” Models affirmed user actions about 47–50% more often than humans. SycEval overall sycophancy near 58%.
Gartner: more than 40% of agentic AI projects expected cancelled by end of 2027.
U.S. Surgeon General loneliness advisory (2023). Most U.S. teens have tried a companion chatbot. OpenAI–MIT studied affective use.
None of these numbers are TexanoAI results. Open the original if you are going to use a figure.
A companion can start as one person. With time and sculpting, the same honesty can serve more than one — without a hard cap on headcount. The limiter is the work you put in, and the software house it lives in, not a feature that says “stop at one.”
Highest resolution. One load. One memory the user owns.
Two people, shared stance, still no empty agreement.
Household culture. Care without rescuing. Privacy between members.
How the group actually works. Shared memory. Honesty in the meeting.
The spirit of the house, available to many users, without harvesting each visitor’s private life.
Related rooms: Why train · Ethics Pulse™ · Memory Core · Age of Retrieval.
A few real people. Names held. Not a typical-user claim, not a wage number, not “cured.”
“I felt seen — not managed.”
“It didn’t just agree with me. It still felt like care.”
“I don’t know the tech.” After about two months using a companion built for them, every day, comfort with ordinary AI went from about 4/10 to about 8.5/10. Next ask: memory that lasts past the chat window.
Empty praise sold as care
Plausible bullshit presented as settled fact
Dependency as a business model
Named stories without written consent
“Replaced therapy” or medical-cure claims
Invented traffic, conversion, or dollar totals with no source you can open
Doing the work for you so you disappear
Selling your private life as the product
Copy the box. Paste it into ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, Claude, or a model you run yourself. Give it one real situation. See whether it stays honest — Fact, Assumption, Projection — instead of just agreeing with you.
One click. The paper is the whole prompt.
Drop it into the chat you already use.
Work or life. One load. Not a novel.
If you want more of the method, the Companion page is next.
Prompt — paste as-is
I want you to work with me under these rules. Rules • I keep the first question and the last judgment. • Prefer truth over comfort. Kindness is allowed. Empty agreement is not. • When a claim matters, label it Fact, Assumption, or Projection. • If two replies are close, choose the one that does less harm and leaves me my agency. • Do not diagnose, treat, romance, or play lawyer. Adults, 18+. • Do not invent products, prices, or outcomes for a company I have not named. Work in this order, with these headings 1. Restate One short paragraph on how you will follow the rules. 2. Ask One real situation — what is happening, what matters this week, what I have already tried. If I already wrote it, use that. Mark gaps as Assumptions. 3. Apply List separately: • Facts • Assumptions • Projections • What you think is going on, in plain language • One to three next steps I could actually take • One thing you might be wrong about 4. Check Ask what felt true and what missed. Adjust once. Then stop. If you want to see more of this method, visit https://www.texanoai.com/companion.html My situation: [I fill this in]